Sunday Times: Sounding the Same is Unsound
March 11th, 2007 by Colin
The following piece was published in the Sunday Times on 11 March 2007:

Sunday Times 7 March 2007
Sounding the same is unsound
by Colin Goh
In a few weeks’ time, our film ‘Singapore Dreaming’ will be premiering in the US, in Philadelphia, San Francisco and later in the year, New York. My cheerfulness was dampened, however, when a well-meaning Singaporean told me: “Congratulations! If only all the dialogue in your film were in perfect English, then an even larger audience will get to see your film and can learn what Singapore is about.”
I’ve heard this sentiment from a number of Singaporeans over the years, and, with great respect, it’s utter rubbish. How can any film be authentically Singaporean if the characters all speak the Queen’s English, especially when this doesn’t happen even in the vast majority of British films? Let ‘em read our subtitles (which happen to be in perfect English), I say.
The relative abilities of foreign cultural products to penetrate the lucrative American market is a complicated issue that has fueled doctoral dissertations the size of phonebooks, and is naturally beyond the scope of this column. But is it true we have to sound exactly like Americans if we want to be accepted by them?
The fallacy of this was emphasized last week by a story in the New York Times about the difficulties faced by Asian-Americans wanting to crack the US pop music charts.
While a number of Asian-Americans have made it as successful behind-the-scenes producers or as part of multi-member rock bands (such as Apl.de.Ap of the Black-Eyed Peas and Mike Shinoda of Linkin Park), the only Asian pop singer with any significant name recognition in the US is, alas, American Idol reject William Hung. (It seems like not only ‘She Bangs’, but a lot of aspiring Asian artistes are feeling pretty bang themselves.)
Why is this the case? There’s certainly no dearth of talent or potential. Is it simply racism? Are Asians trapped by their stereotype as nerds, geeks or inscrutable martial artists/dragon ladies? Some also say the Asian market is also too fragmented – we are less homogeneous than the Caucasian, Black or Hispanic markets.
But one compelling reason is provided by Andy Goldmark, a former VP for talent at Jive Records who’s now trying to market Natalise, a singer of Burmese descent: Asian-Americans tend to follow current trends rather than come up with their own unique sound. Anyone who’s had to endure Singapore Idol knows there’s some truth to this.
I also occasionally receive demos from Singaporean musicians, and while the vast majority is very talented and sincere, most songs also tend to be derivative. But then, Mando, Canto and K-pop are highly derivative too – just generic Western melodies with Asian lyrics. When the Korean superstar Rain did a concert in New York last year, the New York Times dismissed him as a 90’s nostalgia act.
Several years ago, a group of Singapore musicians were brought to New York to perform, one of whom chose to sing Sinatra-like showtunes. The American friends I invited to the performance were puzzled at this. While they found his singing competent, they said his attempt to sound American reminded them of the old Black and White Minstrel show, which featured white folks in black makeup trying to sound like black folks. What was the point?
In other words, we can’t hope to create success in the West by simply replicating Western products, and just slapping on differentiated marketing. The copycat/reverse engineering strategy just doesn’t work in the art world, which seeks uniqueness, not commodities.
And if you look at the foreign acts that have made any headway into the US market, they’re all highly idiosyncratic and couldn’t care less what works on the charts. That’s why J-pop idol Utada Hikaru couldn’t cross over, but Cibo Matto or Shonen Knife could. Also, look how Mandopop is ignored by the US, but hardcore indie Beijing musicians like Subs and Meihao Yaodian,are being watched with interest.
Recently, MP Chan Soo Sen talked about how Singapore needs to develop a cool image. Perhaps we can learn something from Iceland. (After all, nothing is cooler than ice.) With a population of barely over 300,000 and a language that is closest etymologically to Old Norse (and you thought Singlish was a problem), they have spawned global pop stars like Bjork and Sigur Ros, performers who can never be accused of pandering.
When it comes to culture, authenticity and sincerity are far more important, both at home and abroad. Trying to tailor your cultural product to fit the amorphous tastes of the Western public is a speculative exercise doomed to failure.
To be cool, we need to find our own voice, and then be unafraid to let it be heard.
2 Responses to “Sunday Times: Sounding the Same is Unsound”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.




While I agree with most of the points you bring up, I’d like to mention that neither the Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, or the Beatles sounded British when they performed. It’s pretty obvious to me that they tried to sound American in order to break into the US market. Or maybe they needed to in order to play authentic rock and roll. Perhaps what Asian artists face is also due to unfair expectations on the listener’s part. There is a stereotype of ‘Asian exoticism’ that probably fuels the audience’s desire for Asian popular music to be drastically different. Lastly, American artists who sound just like any other American artist face criticism as well. Without a unique voice, it’s tough to make it, no matter where you are coming from.
Hmm. I could agree about the Stones and maybe even Led Zep, but not about the Beatles. They’ve always sounded very Brit to me, and John Lennon and even Wings didn’t sound terribly American even after the Beatles split. I also think the old 60s/70s British Invasion bands form an exception, because there was a trans-Atlantic dialogue of some kind going on at the time, with Hendrix going over, the Stones and Cream channelling the blues, etc.
I don’t think the same can be said for today’s Britpop. Look how Robbie Williams and most mainstream pop UK bands haven’t crossed over very well - it’s the more idiosyncratic ones that have done better, eg Oasis in the 90s, Pulp, etc.
I also don’t think the expectations for Asian music are unfairly different. People just expect you to retain something special or unique, and not just peddle the same old pap with a different marketing hook. Look at the Hispanic market - they have crossover appeal while still maintaining a Latin groove. And the Asians that are making inroads - like the Indians (e.g. MIA), are also retaining their cultural sound.
But you’re right that increasingly, uniqueness is going to be even more important, especially with globalisation.
What I’m afraid of is Asian music indusry suits forcing Asian musicians to neuter anything special about their sound in order to pander to whatever they think Americans want.